Journal: Cell Biology International
Article Title: Different In Vitro Models of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Show Different Characteristics: Biological Replicates Are Not Biologically Equivalent
doi: 10.1002/cbin.70007
Figure Lengend Snippet: Panel of images illustrating the seven different treatment conditions of K562, LAMA84, and KCL22 cell lines obtained using the Invitrogen EVOS XL Core Imaging System with a 20× zoom. Areas of the well that best showed the cellular conditions were selected (including color, shape, size, and the formation of dead cell clusters). Panel A1, A2, A3: Control at 20× zoom in the three cell lines; Panel B1, B2, B3: DMSO at 20X zoom in the three cell lines; Panel C1, C2, C3: imatinib at 20× zoom in the three cell lines; Panel D1, D2, D3: nilotinib at 20× zoom in the three cell lines; Panel E1, E2, E3: dasatinib at 20× zoom in the three cell lines; Panel F1, F2, F3: bosutinib at 20× zoom in the three cell lines; Panel G1, G2, G3: ponatinib at 20× zoom in the three cell lines. Red arrows indicate significantly larger sized cells; blue arrow indicate cell clusters; orange arrows indicate larger sized cells; green arrows indicate irregularly shaped cells; blue boxes highlight apoptotic bodies. (CTR, control; DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; IMA, imatinib; NILO, nilotinib; DASA, dasatinib; BOSU, bosutinib; PONA, ponatinib).
Article Snippet: This observation can be attributed to the fact that the KCL22 cell line has a faster doubling time (24 h) compared to K562 and LAMA84 (35 h and 50 h, respectively) ( https://www.Dsmz.de/Collection/Catalogue/Details/Culture/ACC-168 ; https://www.Dsmz.de/Collection/Catalogue/Details/Culture/ACC-519 ; https://www.Sigmaaldrich.Com/IT/It/Product/Sigma/Cb_89121407 ).
Techniques: Imaging, Control